#FIXED POSITION ON PAGE OS X WORD ANDROID#

And it appears that this error message prevents them from saving Word files. Which implementation do you prefer? Do you see a clear advantage of AppleвЂ™s implementation over BlackBerryвЂ™s? (If you do, please provide a test page.More specifically, users have complained that they run into this problem when they want to save a word document to a location on their computer. I think Apple is being too ambitious here, and may backtrack a bit in the next iOS version. Now this imperfection could be forgiven if there are clear and compelling advantages to AppleвЂ™s implementation that are absent from BlackBerryвЂ™s, but I donвЂ™t really see any. In the video it takes ages and ages to reach the fixed layer after zoom, which means the layer isnвЂ™t really fixed at all. The solution doesnвЂ™t always work very well. This allows the user to inspect all parts of the layer, but IвЂ™m not sure what the point of the slower scrolling is. When zoomed in, Safari scrolls the fixed layer, but slower than the main page. Safari on iOS, finally, is the most ambitious in its treatment of position: fixed. Thus it has true fixed position while simultaneously allowing the user to view the entire fixed layer, including the parts that are off-screen at this zoom level.ДЄll in all I like BlackBerryвЂ™s take best. The example layer scrolls horizontally with the page, but not vertically. The BlackBerry PlayBook also implements true fixed positioning, but handles the zoom use case slightly differently. BlackBerry Browser BlackBerry PlayBook WebKit 2 OS PlayBook 2 ItвЂ™s the closest emulation of desktop position: fixed available and it clearly shows why perfect emulation is not the correct answer.

#FIXED POSITION ON PAGE OS X WORD ANDROID#

The user cannot ever access all of the content in such a fixed layer on Android because thereвЂ™s no way of getting it in view. Many fixed layers built for desktop sites are crammed with stuff and assume a 1024 screen width. Still, there are quite a few problems, especially on mobile phones.

In theory, this is what weвЂ™d like to have everywhere. Android Browser Android WebKit 3.2 OS Android 3.2ДЄndroid WebKit implements true fixed positioning: the layer stays in place no matter what the user does.

Thus OperaвЂ™s implementation does not entirely convince. This is a decent default that avoids some problems, notably the fixed layer accidentally covering up important content. When the user stops scrolling it jumps to the new correct place. The fixed layer is placed correctly, and scrolls with the page. Opera Mobile hasnвЂ™t changed its treatment of position: fixed: it still adheres to the вЂњhoppingвЂќ variant. Opera Browser Opera Mobile 11.50 OS Android 3.2 Nonetheless, the mobile phone use case is more important because the screen is smaller and the danger that the user canвЂ™t see part of the fixed layer larger.ДЄll videos show this test page. I have the new OSs and browser versions available only on tablets, and not on mobile phones, so thatвЂ™s what youвЂ™ll see in the videos. Now that iOS, Android, and BlackBerry all have a new implementation of position: fixed letвЂ™s see what changed since the last time we looked.Д«ecause itвЂ™s fairly hard to describe what mobile and tablet browsers do to position: fixed I decided to make four short videos, both to help you understand the issues better, and to practice a bit with shooting videos of mobile browsers. Sitemap contact Position: fixed revisited

Fixed position on page os x word